Within players within the a dating relationship, extremely was college students (77
89 (SD = dos.27); 4.94 (SD = dos.97), one another communities different between six months and you will eleven numerous years of relationship; 7.76 (SD = 4.01), anywhere between two and you will 19 years; and you can (SD = cuatro.82), between less than a-year and 30 years. 8%) and resided which have members of the family, while those coping with their people were primarily operating some one (69.2%), where 53% had university otherwise postgraduate values. Of your own specialized union users, 67% got university otherwise post-graduate degrees, from which 89.8% was in fact functioning, 2% resigned and you can 8.2% unemployed. https://datingranking.net/fcn-chat-review/ The functional problem to the married members is actually similar: 89.5% had been working, dos.9% was indeed resigned and you will six.3% was in fact unemployed, and you will step 1.3% known another work status. Contained in this class, 62.5% of the professionals got school or postgraduate levels.
Relationship Top quality, selected to confirm standards validity, was mentioned towards the Dating Score Form–Changed (RRF-R; Davis, 1996, adapt
The content showed was gathered inside framework of larger lookup methods, which contained reveal sociodemographic and you may relationships assessment, along with other scales in scope off intimate relationships.
Personal connection is analyzed with regards to the Portuguese adaptation (Table step 1) of smaller kind of this new Time and energy Measure (Stanley, 1986), that has been interpreted according to pursuing the interpretation and you will retroversion tips: immediately following permission was given from the author, the initial level is actually translated of the a couple specialists in the field, these two translations had been exposed to retroversion of the several benefits, you to definitely bilingual and another proficient in the employment of new English language; fundamentally, for each type was versus totally new measure, choosing making use of the brand new words and you will issues that have greater distance to they. The Portuguese adaptation hence consisted of the fresh fourteen fresh activities and you can a comparable address scale and try called, immediately after deliberation from the team, the private Commitment Size (‘Escala de- Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). Into the final stage of your translation techniques, the brand new appliance are given to three users towards goal of verifying the adequateness of your own language plus the unambiguous comprehension of things, that happen to be chatted about towards professionals shortly after applying of brand new questionnaire. As there were no statements stating if you don’t, things remained an identical.
According to the complete time of the relationship, an average, in years, for the more statuses explained is actually, respectively: dos
by Lind, 2008). Resulting from a revision of the original Davis (1996, cited in Lind, 2008) scale, this instrument is intended to measure relationship quality perception, with the expectation that, according to the theoretical assumptions, both scales will positively correlate. The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.